Standard Podcast [12:31m]: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download

…The Real History of Medicine.

Title for this show: New Media for the New Medicine

New Media Expo:
Anyone interested in the new media - the recent portable, digital, networked information and communication technologies, like podcasting, videocasting, online streaming and blogging - should consider attending the New Media Expo next year.

New Media Means More Good Medicines:
Never before in the history of medicine have we been able to report on medical news and information without boundaries, restrictions or controls. With podcasting there are literally infinite numbers of potential ‘channels and stations’ through which medical truths can be promulgated inexpensively to a global audience. A product we discuss on this show is Cholestin produced by the company Pharmanex (we’d love to have them as a sponsor someday). Cholestin is a safe, inexpensive alternative to the statin drugs, like Lipitor, but it’s a natural ‘red yeast rice’ ferment product which is not patentable and therefore will never likely garner enough profit for Pharmanex, to compete with statin drug advertisements in the ‘old media’ - TV, terrestrial radio and print publications most widely read by doctors. What may be even worse for Cholestin is that the pharmaceutical industry’s front agency, the FDA, is actually trying to label red yeast rice products as drugs, so that the products can be FDA-controlled and more likely to be restricted from competing with the statin drugs. Despite those threats, here’s good news for good medicine: with this new media production, TGM, we are able to get the word out about Cholestin - and about a lot of other good medicines - to a global audience!

New Media Moves Maverick Therapies Into Mainstream - Including Cancer Cures:
If there were a simple, safe, evidence-based cure for cancer do you think it would make the mainstream (’old’) media news today? There is such a cure. No mainstream media outlets are talking about it, but we’re talking about it here on the TGM podcast/webcast. The therapy is an immune system-based approach that mirrors the clear biological model of pregnancy and the onset of labor: the cancer patient rejects, expels the cancer tumor using a biological process similar to the way the mother ultimately rejects, expels the fetus from the womb during delivery. It’s a really powerful and well-documented cancer therapy that’s been around for over 20 years: a simple blood filtration technique developed by oncologist Dr. Rigdon Lentz to remove serum blocking factors produced by the cancer. With this approach to treating cancer the patient is not receiving any systemically toxic drugs or being zapped with high-intensity nuclear radiation, or any radiation for that matter. Instead, the procedure simply filters out factors in the patient’s blood which are blocking, preventing, the immune system from doing its job of attacking and devouring the cancer. Our immune system knows when we have cancer. That’s why during pathology in medical school every single slide of cancer we studied was infiltrated with white blood cells (especially lymphocytes), and that’s why some people have so-called ‘spontaneous remissions’ of their cancer. But in so many cases of cancer, the immune system is blocked by the blocking factors produced by the cancer, so the immune system cells can’t  aggressively and thoroughly attack and kill the cancer. Remove the blocking factors from the blood and you remove the ‘force field’ blocking the immune system attack on the cancer. Dramatic tumor ‘necrolysis’ results. We’ll cover the ‘Lentz Therapy’ in  detail during our upcoming Answers to Cancers installments. The point with this for today’s show is that thanks to the new media we’re able to get the word out about this historically important news, this cure for cancer!

Next week: Our first installment of Amazing Aging. What is aging? Is there really such a thing as ‘anti-aging’ medicine? What can you do to fight the ravages of aging in order to live as healthfully as possible for as long as possible?

Good Medicine Word of the Week: New Media (for the advancement of good medicine). And we’re thankful to have the freedom to use the new media to share insights, knowlege and understanding about good medicine here on That’s Good Medicine!

Send TGM #9 to a friend: click here.

 

 Standard Podcast [25:53m]: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download

…The Real History of Medicine.

Title for this show: Best model for your medicine, which one and why?

FDA Approval-Based Medicine: The Worst Model for Medicine. Only recently in medical history we’ve been  locked into this drug-pharmaceutical-based model for health care. And it’s probably medical history’s worst model. We should have an entirely separate agency for the evaluation and approval of natural, non-patentable products. The Germans have one: German Commission E.

Natural Products Grandfathered into Our FDA-Approval-Based Health Care Often Discovered Serendipitously. A few examples inclde include penicillin, aspirin, coumadin and EDTA. Another is nattokinase, a possibly safer alternative to coumadin.

Disease Control Does Not Mean Health Promotion. Drugs control various diseases, but they generally only do so by blocking chemical receptors on our cells or inhibit our enzymes.

Importance of Vitamins as Co-Factors in Enzymes. The function of the B-vitamins and many minerals is to serve as ‘co-factors’ inside the enzymes for their proper function for optimal health.

Importance of Adaptogens. These are well documented herbs that increase our resistance to stress, fatigue and anxiety. Examples: ginseng, ashwagandha, cordyceps and a number of mushrooms. We’ll cover them all here on That’s Good Medicine.

Next week: Humankind’s historic progress in finding the end of aging. And here’s history in the making: FDA being sued by a tenacious group of public health advocates because of the agency’s ongoing support of the American Dental Association and the use of mercury amalgams for dental fillings.

Good Medicine word of the week: Adaptogens - single natural botanical products that promote health.

Send TGM #8 to a friend: click here.

 

 Standard Podcast [25:30m]: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download

…The Real History of Medicine.

Show title, as an analogy: Bio-identical hormones are to medicine today as Homeopathic remedies were to medicine in the 1800s, in the Historic Struggle Between Empiricism and Rationalism.

Bias and Error in MSNBC Story, Mainstream Doctors Join Anti-Aging Bandwagon. We discuss flaws in the story that are of importance to our listeners

Contemporary Doctors Moving Toward Empiricism on the E-to-R Spectrum: The current shift in thinking from rationalism to empiricism is exemplified by the growing numbers of ‘anti-aging’ doctors, and the growth of other integrative medicine professional organizations – such as the American College for the Advancement of Medicine (ACAM) - embracing many healing approaches (not just ‘anti-aging’).

The Growing Use of Bio-identical Hormones: They’re among the most potent and powerful therapies in the modern-day empiricist’s medicine bag. The natural, normal hormone-receptor electromagnetic interactions are specific and delicate. Why should we be predominately using the foreign, ‘space alien,’ ‘designer drug’ hormones provided by the pharmaceutical industry, instead of the natural, bio-identical hormones?

Anti-Aging Medicine = Modern-Day Empiricism, and Big Pharma Not Happy About It. Wyeth pharmaceuticals petitioned the FDA to regulate compounding pharmacies - our only source of the bioidentical hormones prescribed by integrative medicine doctors. Wyeth’s was successful: In January the FDA ordered a number of compounding pharmacies to stop using one of the three, normal, natural, bio-identical female hormones, estriol, in their compounded products. This is unprecedented in the history of medicine. It’s an obvious attack by a pharmaceutical giant colluding with the FDA. This latest assault on ‘natural medicine’ is part of the ongoing empiricist versus rationalist tensions throughout medical history.

Big Pharma Via FDA Violating our Constitutional Rights? The FDA also ordered the compounding pharmacies to stop using the term “bio-identical” in their hormone replacement formulas. Now, like never before in the history of medicine, we need the new media of podcasting - and probably the likes of Congressman Ron Paul - to protect our medical freedoms, significantly limit government corruption by the pharmaceutical industry and allow for the advancement of good medicine. We need to continually remind ourselves and our government officials: They work for us.

Take Action through the American Association for Health Freedom (AAHF): The FDA has banned the importation of the bio-identical, female hormone estriol into the United States, but a U.S. House resolution deemed FDA’s ban on estriol to be “not in the public interest.” CLICK HERE to: tell your members of Congress to protect your access to natural, bio-identical hormone replacement therapy and to sponsor H. Con. Res. 342.

Good Medicine Word of the Week: Bio-identical hormones. They’re chemical messengers that have the same exact, unique structure that our bodies make naturally, and for which we have perfectly matching receptors on each of our cells. This is in contrast with pharmaceutical hormones: designer drugs with molecular structures similar enough to result in a similar effects on our cell receptors, but still without the same ‘perfect fit’ that the natural hormones have with our receptors. From earlier show: ’space alien’ molecules have ’space alien effects.’

Next Week’s Show: Historical importance of medical serendipity, adaptogens (natural anti-stress medicines), and much more.

Send TGM #7 to a friend: click here.

 

 Standard Podcast [25:57m]: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download

…The Real History of Medicine

Show Title: History Repeating: Empirically Minded Doctors Increasing Despite Political and Economic Disadvantages

Mainstream Doctors Join Anti-Aging Bandwagon (MSNBC.com): Highlights the “often bitter tension” between conventional medicine (rationalist minded doctors) and the empiricist minded doctors (’anti-aging’ physicians - the largest aggregate of empirically minded contemporary ‘integrative medicine’ doctors today).

Analogy: ‘Anti-aging medicine is to FDA-approval-based medicine now as homeopathy was to allopathic medicine in the 1800s. The same vested interests don’t want to see natural, integrative medicine flourish today.

Prime therapy of concern to modern day drug companies and rationalists : Bio-identical hormones.

Hierarchy of Scientific Study Types from ‘Empiricism to Rationalism’: Case studies, animal experiments, expert opinions, descriptive reports, epidimiology studies, expert concensus, cohort or case-control analyses, non-randomized and randomized controlled trials.

Greatest Obstacle to Mainstreaming Integrative Medicine: Financial Limitations. Big Pharma has more money for: 1) marketing on mainstream media, 2) FDA/AMA/medical board schmoozing, and 3) congressional lobbying. In 2007 the pharmaceutical industry was Washington’s largest lobbying force, according to report by Center for Public Integrity. What was Pharma’s ‘ROI’? They squashed recent Congressional efforts to restrict drug media advertising.

Is ‘Anti-Aging’ Medicine ‘Just About Physicians Trying to Boost Their Income’? That’s what one ‘ivory tower’ doctor said in the MSNBC.com story. Boosting income is part of it, but more important is the steadily growing public demand for therapeutic approaches that promote health.

Are the Rationalist Drug-Oriented Doctors More Mechanically Minded/The Empiricist Integrative Medicine Doctors More Bio-Energetically Minded? One thing the MSNBC story got right was that “most conventional doctors are mechanics. They fix things.” Those are the rationalist physicians of today. Most empirically-minded doctors tend to be healers of the psyche, the nervous system, the endocrine system and the all-important immunological system ( Psychoneuroimmunology, PNI as it’s called). And which therapeutic approaches probably hold greatest promise for the future of our health, healing, prevention and ‘anti-aging’? Bioenergetic approaches.

Good Medicine Word of the Week: Anti-Aging Medicine - the realm of modern-day empiricists. But a better name is Integrative Medicine.

Next Week’s Show: 4th installment of History of Healing – History of Killing. We’ll explore how Big Pharma is in cahoots with the FDA, violating our constitutional rights.

Send TGM #6 to a friend: click here.

 

 Standard Podcast [24:39m]: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download

…The Real History of Medicine.

Title for this installment: Experiences in Empiricism - Past and Present.

Introduction: “The beautiful rests on the foundations of the necessary,” Ralph Waldo Emerson. Thanks for being part of the early TGM experience as we continue to lay the necessary foundation for what we think is beautiful, good medicine. Empirically minded doctors throughout history have had the mindset that evidence from experience – if the evidence has born the test of time – is just as valuable as evidence supported by rigorous scientific research. The practitioners who are more rationalist-minded tend to believe – rationalize – that we shouldn’t offer any therapy unless: A) it’s undergone the gamut of scientific studies to ‘prove’ that it’s safe and effective; and B) unless we’ve fully defined the therapy’s mechanism of action. This is neither practical nor realistic for the advancement of good medicine.

Empiricism at Work Historically: The Homeopaths Introduced Nitroglycerin to Medicine.
Nitroglycerin is a perfect case in point for our discussion today, because back in the 1800s, before the FDA even existed, it was introduced into medicine empirically, not based on controlled scientific studies. And we need to credit and thank the Homeopaths – the chief empiricists of that time – for the fact that the good medicine has been grandfathered into our modern-day ‘standard of care.’

If the Homeopaths Introduced Nitroglycerin into Medicine Today:
The current ‘FDA-Approval-Based’ health care model (the approval of drugs, ‘space alien molecules’) largely controls our health care and it fosters and epitomizes the rationalist mindset. It’s possible that if nitroglycerin were discovered today that we’d never get the medication through the FDA approval process and included in our therapeutic armamentarium.

EDTA Chelation: Contemporary Example of Empirically-Based Therapy.
The NIH Trial to Assess Chelation Therapy (TACT) for the treatment of cardiovascular did not come about as a result of a pharmaceutical company wanting to get approval for a promising cardiovascular drug, since Abbot lab’s patent on EDTA expired a long time ago. Instead, the NIH trial was initiated largely as a result of public pressure on the NIH – pressure by innovative, contemporary, empirically-minded doctors and their satisfied patients – to get approval for a non-patentable, and thus non-prevailing therapy that empirically really works (based on the historical experiences of doctors and their patients).

Modern-Day Medical Mavericks and Chelation Therapy:
Even to get to the point of now having the NIH trial, a lot of good doctors, empirically-minded practitioners - history’s recent medical heretics – have fought really hard to be able to offer EDTA chelation to their patients.

Insights From Informal Polling of Contemporary Empiricists at ACAM Meetings:
If the vast majority of doctors offering intravenous EDTA chelation to their cardiovascular disease patients (with chest pain and claudication) indicate during a ’straw pole’ that they see – experience – dramatic improvements in their patients, does this really mean anything? To the empirically minded doctor, probably: yes. To the rationalist minded doctor: probably not. The different frames of reference and perceptions regarding the value of empirical evidence illustrate the tension between the empiricists and the rationalists throughout medical history.

Echoes From the Wilds of Good Medicine: Thank you Steve from Arizona for feedback and insights.

Good Medicine Word of the Week: Empiricism - the frame of thought, the mindset for medicine, that experience-based evidence throughout medical history - not necessarily just controlled clinical trials - are really important and valid aspects of good, evidence-based medicine.

Next week’s show: The 3rd installment of History of Healing–History of Killing, with more necessary insights to lay the foundation for TGM.

Good medicine is a beautiful thing. Thanks for being part of it with us!

Send TGM #5 to a friend: click here.

 

 Standard Podcast [17:25m]: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download

The Real History of Medicine

Title for this installment: Empiricism versus Rationalism: The tension continues on the medical front lines, and will never end.

To continue to lay the foundation for That’s Good Medicine, lets talk about:

Why we baby boomers should know and understand medical history: The disadvantage of men not knowing the past is that they do not know the present. History is a hill or high point of vantage, from which alone men see…the age in which they are living. [G. K. Chesterton (1874 - 1936)]. We need to know the past to understand what’s really good medicine! The history of allopathic medicine (conventional, orthodox medicine) has been largely one of suppression both in its therapeutic approaches and politics. And some very important historical milestones are simply left out from most medical history timelines.

Empiricism’ versus ‘Rationalism’: critical foundational concepts for our listeners:

Empiricists - past and present - recognize that medicine is largely based on experience, not rigorous science. Most of our current therapies and therapeutic approaches are not based on scientific studies, nor do we know exactly how a lot of what we do even works, but we use it anyway. The empiricist says, “That’s okay, as long as it works, and it’s safe.”

Rationalist-minded practitioners on the other hand ‘rationalize’ that under all (or most) circumstances – even independent of experience - we should and must define the rationale for every therapeutic approach before we can offer it to our patients. This is neither practical nor possible.

The ongoing tension between empirically-minded practitioners and the rationalists is epitomized historically by the homeopaths versus the druggists, the druggers -  the conventional doctors of the day who have the AMA/rationalist mentality.

Bottom line: 1) Our system of health care, and all systems of health care, have evolved primarily from doctors’ experiences with their patients – real life experimentation figuratively speaking – not from scientific research studies on humans or other animals; 2) TGM listeners’ high point of vantage should allow them to see that the empiricist versus rationalist concept is really a spectrum (not black or white), with each healthcare practitioner poised, in his thinking, at some point between the two poles; 3) The history of medicine is characterized by a perpetual tension between the two ways of thinking, providing a yin-yang balance; 4) Key for the advancement of good medicine is for doctors to find the right spot on the spectrum between empiricism and rationalism, because too much of either is not good medicine.

Echoes from the Wilds of Good Medicine (listener feedback). Lisa from Louisiana wrote:

“I have listened to your first few episodes and I am very excited that you are doing this for us who are out there looking for ways to take our health into our own hands by searching for information. I must comment on one thing though: Your target audience. I understand that the majority of your listeners may be baby boomers but don’t forget about those of us out there who do not fit into that category. I, for instance, am 37 yrs old and have lived with Ulcerative Colitis [UC] for 13 years. Keep up the good work. I’m looking forward to you next show.”

Thanks Lisa. Please always know that we Baby Boomers (from the love generation) welcome you and all other X-Geners to TGM!

Integrative Medicine Approaches for Ulcerative Colitis: At Kevin’s insistence, in response to Lisa’s feedback, we mention a few integrative medicine approaches for UC, which we’ll cover in depth on future shows, and the new discovery that UC is caused from an immune deficiency - more specifically and importantly, it occurs from autoimmunity. It’s an auto-immune condition due to dysbiosis in the gut when white blood cells capture antigens of foreign microbes and activate the immune defenses. This emphasizes the critical importance of gastrointestinal health and the potential for probiotics for health and healing!

Good Medicine Word of the Week: Rationalism: the belief that under all or most circumstances we must use scientific studies to fully define the rationale for every therapeutic approach, before we can offer it to our patients. This is not rational for the advancement of good medicine!

Next week’s show: 2nd installment of History of Healing-History of Killing. Nitroglycerine is a really good medicine. Is our current use of it based on scientific studies? Which empiricists of the 1800s are responsible for our current use nitroglycerine? The homeopaths! We’ll also discuss: why contemporary doctors are positioning themselves more and more toward the pole of empiricism; the concept of health promotion versus disease control; and why the new model of health care that we’re currently dominated by – the FDA Approval-Based Health Care’ Model - is not good medicine.

Send TGM #4 to a friend: click here.