Standard Podcast [25:30m]: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download

…The Real History of Medicine.

Show Title: Analogy: Bio-Identical Hormones Today - Homeopathic Remedies in 1800s, in the Historic Struggle Between Empiricism and Rationalism.

Bias and Error in MSNBC Story, Mainstream Doctors Join Anti-Aging Bandwagon. We discuss flaws in the story that are of importance to our listeners

Contemporary Doctors Moving Toward Empiricism on the E-to-R Spectrum: The current shift in thinking from rationalism to empiricism is exemplified by the growing numbers of ‘anti-aging’ doctors, and the growth of other integrative medicine professional organizations – such as the American College for the Advancement of Medicine (ACAM) - embracing many healing approaches (not just ‘anti-aging’).

The Growing Use of Bio-identical Hormones: They’re among the most potent and powerful therapies in the modern-day empiricist’s medicine bag. The natural, normal hormone-receptor electromagnetic interactions are specific and delicate. Why should we be predominately using the foreign, ‘space alien,’ ‘designer drug’ hormones provided by the pharmaceutical industry, instead of the natural, bio-identical hormones?

Anti-Aging Medicine = Modern-Day Empiricism, and Big Pharma Not Happy About It. Wyeth pharmaceuticals petitioned the FDA to regulate compounding pharmacies - our only source of the bioidentical hormones prescribed by integrative medicine doctors. Wyeth’s was successful: In January the FDA ordered a number of compounding pharmacies to stop using one of the three, normal, natural, bio-identical female hormones, estriol, in their compounded products. This is unprecedented in the history of medicine. It’s an obvious attack by a pharmaceutical giant colluding with the FDA. This latest assault on ‘natural medicine’ is part of the ongoing empiricist versus rationalist tensions throughout medical history.

Big Pharma Via FDA Violating our Constitutional Rights? The FDA also ordered the compounding pharmacies to stop using the term “bio-identical” in their hormone replacement formulas. Now, like never before in the history of medicine, we need the new media of podcasting and probably the likes of Congressman Ron Paul to protect our medical freedoms, significantly limit government corruption by the pharmaceutical industry and allow for the advancement of good medicine. We need to continually remind ourselves and our government officials: They work for us.

Take Action through the American Association for Health Freedom (AAHF): The FDA has banned the importation of the bio-identical, female hormone estriol into the United States, but a U.S. House resolution deemed FDA’s ban on estriol to be “not in the public interest.” CLICK HERE to: tell your members of Congress to protect your access to natural, bio-identical hormone replacement therapy and to sponsor H. Con. Res. 342.

Good Medicine Word of the Week: Bio-identical hormones. They’re chemical messengers that have the same exact, unique structure that our bodies make naturally, and for which we have perfectly matching receptors on each of our cells. This is in contrast with pharmaceutical hormones: designer drugs with molecular structures similar enough to result in a similar effects on our cell receptors, but still without the same ‘perfect fit’ that the natural hormones have with our receptors. From earlier show: ’space alien’ molecules have ’space alien effects.’

Next Week’s Show: Historical importance of medical serendipity, adaptogens (natural anti-stress medicines), and much more.

 

 Standard Podcast [25:57m]: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download

…The Real History of Medicine

Show Title: History Repeating: Empirically Minded Doctors Increasing Despite Political and Economic Disadvantages

Mainstream Doctors Join Anti-Aging Bandwagon (MSNBC.com): Highlights the “often bitter tension” between conventional medicine (rationalist minded doctors) and the empiricist minded doctors (’anti-aging’ physicians - the largest aggregate of empirically minded contemporary ‘integrative medicine’ doctors today).

Analogy: ‘Anti-aging medicine is to FDA-approval-based medicine now as homeopathy was to allopathic medicine in the 1800s. The same vested interests don’t want to see natural, integrative medicine flourish today.

Prime therapy of concern to modern day drug companies and rationalists : Bio-identical hormones.

Hierarchy of Scientific Study Types from ‘Empiricism to Rationalism’: Case studies, animal experiments, expert opinions, descriptive reports, epidimiology studies, expert concensus, cohort or case-control analyses, non-randomized and randomized controlled trials.

Greatest Obstacle to Mainstreaming Integrative Medicine: Financial Limitations. Big Pharma has more money for: 1) marketing on mainstream media, 2) FDA/AMA/medical board schmoozing, and 3) congressional lobbying. In 2007 the pharmaceutical industry was Washington’s largest lobbying force, according to report by Center for Public Integrity. What was Pharma’s ‘ROI’? They squashed recent Congressional efforts to restrict drug media advertising.

Is ‘Anti-Aging’ Medicine ‘Just About Physicians Trying to Boost Their Income’? That’s what one ‘ivory tower’ doctor said in the MSNBC.com story. Boosting income is part of it, but more important is the steadily growing public demand for therapeutic approaches that promote health.

Are the Rationalist Drug-Oriented Doctors More Mechanically Minded/The Empiricist Integrative Medicine Doctors More Bio-Energetically Minded? One thing the MSNBC story got right was that “most conventional doctors are mechanics. They fix things.” Those are the rationalist physicians of today. Most empirically-minded doctors tend to be healers of the psyche, the nervous system, the endocrine system and the all-important immunological system ( Psychoneuroimmunology, PNI as it’s called). And which therapeutic approaches probably hold greatest promise for the future of our health, healing, prevention and ‘anti-aging’? Bioenergetic approaches.

Good Medicine Word of the Week: Anti-Aging Medicine - the realm of modern-day empiricists. But a better name is Integrative Medicine.

Next Week’s Show: 4th installment of History of Healing – History of Killing. We’ll explore how Big Pharma is in cahoots with the FDA, violating our constitutional rights.

 

 Standard Podcast [24:39m]: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download

…The Real History of Medicine.

Title for this installment: Experiences in Empiricism - Past and Present.

Introduction: “The beautiful rests on the foundations of the necessary,” Ralph Waldo Emerson. Thanks for being part of the early TGM experience as we continue to lay the necessary foundation for what we think is beautiful, good medicine. Empirically minded doctors throughout history have had the mindset that evidence from experience – if the evidence has born the test of time – is just as valuable as evidence supported by rigorous scientific research. The practitioners who are more rationalist-minded tend to believe – rationalize – that we shouldn’t offer any therapy unless: A) it’s undergone the gamut of scientific studies to ‘prove’ that it’s safe and effective; and B) unless we’ve fully defined the therapy’s mechanism of action. This is neither practical nor realistic for the advancement of good medicine.

Empiricism at Work Historically: The Homeopaths Introduced Nitroglycerin to Medicine.
Nitroglycerin is a perfect case in point for our discussion today, because back in the 1800s, before the FDA even existed, it was introduced into medicine empirically, not based on controlled scientific studies. And we need to credit and thank the Homeopaths – the chief empiricists of that time – for the fact that the good medicine has been grandfathered into our modern-day ‘standard of care.’

If the Homeopaths Introduced Nitroglycerin into Medicine Today:
The current ‘FDA-Approval-Based’ health care model (the approval of drugs, ‘space alien molecules’) largely controls our health care and it fosters and epitomizes the rationalist mindset. It’s possible that if nitroglycerin were discovered today that we’d never get the medication through the FDA approval process and included in our therapeutic armamentarium.

EDTA Chelation: Contemporary Example of Empirically-Based Therapy.
The NIH Trial to Assess Chelation Therapy (TACT) for the treatment of cardiovascular did not come about as a result of a pharmaceutical company wanting to get approval for a promising cardiovascular drug, since Abbot lab’s patent on EDTA expired a long time ago. Instead, the NIH trial was initiated largely as a result of public pressure on the NIH – pressure by innovative, contemporary, empirically-minded doctors and their satisfied patients – to get approval for a non-patentable, and thus non-prevailing therapy that empirically really works (based on the historical experiences of doctors and their patients).

Modern-Day Medical Mavericks and Chelation Therapy:
Even to get to the point of now having the NIH trial, a lot of good doctors, empirically-minded practitioners - history’s recent medical heretics – have fought really hard to be able to offer EDTA chelation to their patients.

Insights From Informal Polling of Contemporary Empiricists at ACAM Meetings:
If the vast majority of doctors offering intravenous EDTA chelation to their cardiovascular disease patients (with chest pain and claudication) indicate during a ’straw pole’ that they see – experience – dramatic improvements in their patients, does this really mean anything? To the empirically minded doctor, probably: yes. To the rationalist minded doctor: probably not. The different frames of reference and perceptions regarding the value of empirical evidence illustrate the tension between the empiricists and the rationalists throughout medical history.

Echoes From the Wilds of Good Medicine: Thank you Steve from Arizona for feedback and insights.

Good Medicine Word of the Week: Empiricism - the frame of thought, the mindset for medicine, that experience-based evidence throughout medical history - not necessarily just controlled clinical trials - are really important and valid aspects of good, evidence-based medicine.

Next week’s show: The 3rd installment of History of Healing–History of Killing, with more necessary insights to lay the foundation for TGM.

Good medicine is a beautiful thing. Thanks for being part of it with us!

 

 Standard Podcast [17:25m]: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download

The Real History of Medicine

Title for this installment: Empiricism versus Rationalism: The tension continues on the medical front lines, and will never end.

To continue to lay the foundation for That’s Good Medicine, lets talk about:

Why we baby boomers should know and understand medical history: The disadvantage of men not knowing the past is that they do not know the present. History is a hill or high point of vantage, from which alone men see…the age in which they are living. [G. K. Chesterton (1874 - 1936)]. We need to know the past to understand what’s really good medicine! The history of allopathic medicine (conventional, orthodox medicine) has been largely one of suppression both in its therapeutic approaches and politics. And some very important historical milestones are simply left out from most medical history timelines.

Empiricism’ versus ‘Rationalism’: critical foundational concepts for our listeners:

Empiricists - past and present - recognize that medicine is largely based on experience, not rigorous science. Most of our current therapies and therapeutic approaches are not based on scientific studies, nor do we know exactly how a lot of what we do even works, but we use it anyway. The empiricist says, “That’s okay, as long as it works, and it’s safe.”

Rationalist-minded practitioners on the other hand ‘rationalize’ that under all (or most) circumstances – even independent of experience - we should and must define the rationale for every therapeutic approach before we can offer it to our patients. This is neither practical nor possible.

The ongoing tension between empirically-minded practitioners and the rationalists is epitomized historically by the homeopaths versus the druggists, the druggers -  the conventional doctors of the day who have the AMA/rationalist mentality.

Bottom line: 1) Our system of health care, and all systems of health care, have evolved primarily from doctors’ experiences with their patients – real life experimentation figuratively speaking – not from scientific research studies on humans or other animals; 2) TGM listeners’ high point of vantage should allow them to see that the empiricist versus rationalist concept is really a spectrum (not black or white), with each healthcare practitioner poised, in his thinking, at some point between the two poles; 3) The history of medicine is characterized by a perpetual tension between the two ways of thinking, providing a yin-yang balance; 4) Key for the advancement of good medicine is for doctors to find the right spot on the spectrum between empiricism and rationalism, because too much of either is not good medicine.

Echoes from the Wilds of Good Medicine (listener feedback). Lisa from Louisiana wrote:

“I have listened to your first few episodes and I am very excited that you are doing this for us who are out there looking for ways to take our health into our own hands by searching for information. I must comment on one thing though: Your target audience. I understand that the majority of your listeners may be baby boomers but don’t forget about those of us out there who do not fit into that category. I, for instance, am 37 yrs old and have lived with Ulcerative Colitis [UC] for 13 years. Keep up the good work. I’m looking forward to you next show.”

Thanks Lisa. Please always know that we Baby Boomers (from the love generation) welcome you and all other X-Geners to TGM!

Integrative Medicine Approaches for Ulcerative Colitis: At Kevin’s insistence, in response to Lisa’s feedback, we mention a few integrative medicine approaches for UC, which we’ll cover in depth on future shows, and the new discovery that UC is caused from an immune deficiency - more specifically and importantly, it occurs from autoimmunity. It’s an auto-immune condition due to dysbiosis in the gut when white blood cells capture antigens of foreign microbes and activate the immune defenses. This emphasizes the critical importance of gastrointestinal health and the potential for probiotics for health and healing!

Good Medicine Word of the Week: Rationalism: the belief that under all or most circumstances we must use scientific studies to fully define the rationale for every therapeutic approach, before we can offer it to our patients. This is not rational for the advancement of good medicine!

Next week’s show: 2nd installment of History of Healing-History of Killing. Nitroglycerine is a really good medicine. Is our current use of it based on scientific studies? Which empiricists of the 1800s are responsible for our current use nitroglycerine? The homeopaths! We’ll also discuss: why contemporary doctors are positioning themselves more and more toward the pole of empiricism; the concept of health promotion versus disease control; and why the new model of health care that we’re currently dominated by – the FDA Approval-Based Health Care’ Model - is not good medicine.

 

 Standard Podcast [25:05m]: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download

Critiques and Criticisms of the Dis-ease Management System

Title for this episode: Reflections on Dr. Wright Interview OR If It Isn’t Biological, It Isn’t Logical!

Drugs - pharmaceuticals - are ’space alien molecules’: As Dr. Jonathan Wright described them on last week’s show, drugs are foreign to earth and foreign to our bodies. Drugs aren’t ‘just another consumer product’ advertised on TV. They affect our metabolism – our ‘bio-chemistry’ - powerfully and profoundly.

Will the Real Alternative Medicine Please Stand Up? Drugs - as recent inventions - are the real ‘alternative medicines’ (alternatives to natural therapeutics).

Alien Molecules Have Alien Effects: Dr. Wright asked: “Any time we take a molecule that has never been found naturally on the planet (and thus never found in the human body) and give it to humans, what should we expect?” Answer: Expect ‘alien effects’ on our chemistries (our biochemistries). We can’t and shouldn’t throw out all drugs, but it’s time to put more emphasis on science-based natural therapies.

If It Isn’t ‘Bio-Logical, It Isn’t Logical: We think our baby boomer listeners need to remember that we’re all animals living in nature, and we need to start integrating into our own health care plans a lot more of the molecules and modalities which nature has to offer, including lifestyle medicine approaches (we’ll cover lifestyle on upcoming Start-a-New installments).

Control Means Power, Power Means Control: Listen and learn why patent medicines – pharmaceuticals, drugs - give the FDA extensive power, and why the FDA and the pharmaceutical industry have so much control over our health care choices. Why are drugs so entrenched into US health care, while many effective, inexpensive natural products continue to struggle for a place in the market? And why do patent medicines set the FDA up for corruption by pharmaceutical companies? We discuss why.

Approval Power Means Control: We highlight the natural omega-3 fatty acid, DHA (docosahenoic acid) as an example of a natural product (for prevention of Alzheimer’s dementia) which - due to FDA politics - is unlikely to ever get FDA approval, and thus to ever become ’standard of care,’ and covered by our health insurance policies.

We Become Silent (the movie): click here. Government intrusions into our freedoms and privacy aren’t just from of the effects of 21st century religious terrorism, but also from issues around natural therapies. See why our federal government and global forces - the W.T.O. and U.N. - want to take control of the supply of natural products with Codex Alimentarius. What’s the simplest way to acquire that control? Simply reclassify natural products as drugs. Now there’s a twist.

Next week’s show: 1st installment of History of Killing/History of Healing - the real history of medicine - to continue laying the foundation for That’s Good Medicine.

 

 Standard Podcast [21:16m]: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download

Critiques and Criticisms of the Dis-ease Management System

Name for this episode: Interview with Jonathan Wright, MD - continuing to lay the premise for That’s Good Medicine.

Hear this:

Tahoma Clinic FDA Raid: We discuss the historic Tahoma Clinic raid of 1992 when armed FDA agents stormed Dr. Wright’s medical practice during clinic hours. What onerous things was Dr. Wright doing to his patients to incite the wrath of a federal agency to terrorize him and his patients? He was administering intravenous (IV) vitamins and recommending the amino acid tryptophan to some of his patients. The FDA agents confiscated Dr. Wright’s patient records, his computers and medical supplies and didn’t return them for 3 years. The FDA doesn’t have the authority to regulate patient care. What’s amazing is that Dr. Wright was never charged of wrongdoing. The raid on Dr. Wright’s clinic was one of the first forays in a campaign of terror by the FDA to send messages to integrative medicine doctors and natural product companies that they could be raided and shut down too. How would you feel if the FDA confiscated your medical records from your doctor? Why did this really happen? Is this sort of despotism by our federal government a thing of the past? Maybe not. Dr. Douglass thinks Congressman Ron Paul for President was (is?) one of our only hopes for protecting health freedoms.

Interview with Dr. Wright: What’s the real ‘alternative medicine’? Hint: It’s about ’space alien molecules.’

Good Medicine Word of the Day: ‘Patent’ medicines. What we know as pharmaceuticals, or ‘drugs,’ are really patent medicines (‘space alien molecules’ - as Dr. Wright described them). The FDA essentially approves only pharmaceuticals (’designer drugs’), not natural products. And this approval process gives the FDA tremendous power.

Next week’s show: Part3 of this 3-part Dropping the Bomb series. We’ll reflect on what Dr. Wright taught us during today’s interview, and why patent medicines (’drugs’) give the FDA so much power. And why this is important for you to understand, as we explore - on future installments - the global power play between conventional (’allopathic’) medicine and integrative medicine.

 

 Standard Podcast [18:10m]: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download

Critiques and criticisms of the dis-ease management system.

Title for this week’s episode: It’s time to mainstream ‘integrative medicine’ - the premise show.

Learn the whos, whats, whens and whys of That’s Good Medicine:

Why: To teach science-based health and healing modalities – especially natural approaches - not just drugs and surgery. And to help listeners sort through the plethora of health information. Imparting health wisdom for making wiser choices.

Who: Dr. Douglass and host, Kevin Kilpatrick are introduced, as are medical social worker Kathy Jo King and audio engineer Chester Cruise. And who are in our target audience? Intelligent, open-minded baby boomers around the world (folks born between 1946 and 1964, currently between 44 and 62 years old).

What: Content will consist of ‘integrative medicine’ topics (previously called ‘alternative’ or ‘complementary-alternative’ medicine). Employing topic-specific installments (such as this ‘Dropping the Bomb’ series) we’ll look at the science behind subjects like nutrition, herbal medicine, energy medicine, stem cell therapy, body work, detoxification strategies, and lots more.

When and How Much: Weekly 15-20 minute shows.

Good Medicine Word of the Day: ‘integrative’ medicine

Next week’s show: On the second part of this 2-part Dropping the Bomb series, we’ll interview medical maverick and integrative medicine pioneer Dr. Jonathan Wright. Focus: the concept of how ‘modern man’ uses - almost exclusively - only synthetic, artificial medications in our system of disease care - drugs which are not only foreign to the body, but foreign to nature too. We’ll discuss why this has come about. Prior to the interview we’ll discuss the famous Tahoma Clinic FDA Raid of 1992 when Armed FDA agents smashed through the door of Dr. Wright’s clinic during clinic hours and confiscated patients’ records, the clinic’s computers and Dr. Wright’s medical/nutritional supplies. And what was Dr. Wright’s ‘crime’? He was administering intravenous vitamins to his patients.